| Author |
Message |
Eun-Hjzjined
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:41 pm
Re: NanoPlayer (in development -- screenshot!)
Sorry to bug the community..... but....
♫BUMP♫
Theres been no new info since march.
Sorry to bug the community..... but....
[size=200]♫BUMP♫[/size]
Theres been no new info since march.
|
 |
Eun-Hjzjined
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 12:42 am
Re: NanoPlayer (in development -- screenshot!)
Bump? 
Bump? [-o<
|
 |
Eun-Hjzjined
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 5:15 am
Re: NanoPlayer (in development -- screenshot!)
Global hotkeys: Have the app look for broams by default. Use bbkeys to send such broams on keypress. That way the player won't have to scan for keypresses.
Global hotkeys: Have the app look for broams by default. Use bbkeys to send such broams on keypress. That way the player won't have to scan for keypresses.
|
 |
igndenok
|
Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:50 am
Re: NanoPlayer (in development -- screenshot!)
argh... when it's done, and where i can grab the use it. i love your simplicity model. and my for my wish list, maybe i can add additional components like fb2k in nano player. just let me know when it's done brother.
update: don't forget to add lossless support ?!
argh... when it's done, and where i can grab the use it. i love your simplicity model. and my for my wish list, maybe i can add additional components like fb2k in nano player. just let me know when it's done brother.
update: don't forget to add lossless support ?!
|
 |
AlFa
|
Posted: Tue Mar 25, 2008 1:40 am
Re: NanoPlayer (in development -- screenshot!)
Good to hear/read that. How much memory/cpu do you think it'll use?
Good to hear/read that. How much memory/cpu do you think it'll use?
|
 |
noccy
|
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2008 7:19 pm
Re: NanoPlayer (in development -- screenshot!)
I'm a Foobar user so I would settle for no less  And yes, global hotkey support is a given.
I'm a Foobar user so I would settle for no less ;)
And yes, global hotkey support is a given.
|
 |
AlFa
|
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 11:12 pm
Re: NanoPlayer (in development -- screenshot!)
Mmmh.....certainly looks nice. But I still have to try it to see if it can replace the almighty foobar... @Noccy: Is there gonna be hotkeysupport? (and I am thinking about GLOBAL hotkeys here, like foobar or winamp support them)
Mmmh.....certainly looks nice. But I still have to try it to see if it can replace the almighty foobar... @Noccy: Is there gonna be hotkeysupport? (and I am thinking about GLOBAL hotkeys here, like foobar or winamp support them)
|
 |
Eun-Hjzjined
|
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 8:30 pm
Re: NanoPlayer (in development -- screenshot!)
I am looking forward to this being MUCH lighter than Foobar and having direct broam or CMD line control.
Soldier on Noccy. Soldier on.
I am looking forward to this being MUCH lighter than Foobar and having direct broam or CMD line control.
Soldier on Noccy. Soldier on.
|
 |
Niniel
|
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:08 pm
Re: NanoPlayer (in development -- screenshot!)
sammynono wrote: there's too many wmp's in that sentence ](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif) WMP (11) is quite good. I would never have suspected it, but since I am forced to use it at work, I've gotten to know it quite well.
[quote="sammynono"]there's too many wmp's in that sentence ](*,)[/quote]
WMP (11) is quite good. I would never have suspected it, but since I am forced to use it at work, I've gotten to know it quite well.
|
 |
sammynono
|
Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 1:15 am
Re: NanoPlayer (in development -- screenshot!)
there's too many wmp's in that sentence ](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)
there's too many wmp's in that sentence ](*,)
|
 |
Mark
|
Posted: Tue Mar 18, 2008 11:51 am
Re: NanoPlayer (in development -- screenshot!)
It looks very promising noccy. I'd definitely switch to it if its commands were accessible via command line.
It looks very promising noccy. I'd definitely switch to it if its commands were accessible via command line.
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:27 pm
Re: NanoPlayer (in development -- screenshot!)
nice... if this gets a media library as good as WMP and sound and equalizer as good as WMP (yes thats what i get the best sound from) it might just become a replacer for my WMP :p
nice... if this gets a media library as good as WMP and sound and equalizer as good as WMP (yes thats what i get the best sound from) it might just become a replacer for my WMP :p
|
 |
noccy
|
Posted: Tue Mar 11, 2008 11:38 am
Re: NanoPlayer (in development -- screenshot!)
I wish I had infinite time  It's moving, but slowly 
I wish I had infinite time 8) It's moving, but slowly :D
|
 |
Niniel
|
Posted: Fri Feb 29, 2008 6:59 pm
Re: NanoPlayer (in development -- screenshot!)
WMP11 with the Blackbar skin... works pretty good, and is very unobtrusive in skin mode (it's transparent when out of of focus).
WMP11 with the Blackbar skin... works pretty good, and is very unobtrusive in skin mode (it's transparent when out of of focus).
|
 |
Eun-Hjzjined
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2008 9:31 am
Re: NanoPlayer (in development -- screenshot!)
bump....
bump....
|
 |